“I
do not agree with what you have to say, but I’ll defend to the death your right
to say it.”
-Voltaire
If
you asked any number of random people on the street if they were in favor of
freedom of speech, odds are the majority would be supportive. Everyone has the
ability to think and speak for themselves – possessing freedom of speech simply
means that some high governmental authority is allowing you to do this in
public, free of consequence…well, free of consequence from that specific
authority, at least. Unfortunately there are, as we have witnessed through
recent events, those who see themselves fit to play god and rob others of the
gift of boundless expression.
I
have heard the opinion of those who question not Charlie Hebdo’s right to
express opinion, but their justification in provoking such a volatile
situation. If they had been attacked before, why would they continue to
satirize the world, upsetting many in the process? Does freedom of speech,
freedom of the press include a right to offend? Is Omer el-Hamdoon, president
of the Muslim Association of Britain, correct in his assertion that offending
for the sake of offense is not freedom of speech?
But
I worry that a silent press would be misconstrued as one supportive of and
subservient to those offended. As soon as one does something, alters thoughts
or actions for someone, in
consideration of something, there is an acknowledgement of influence and
agreement between the two parties. If a bully gets their way, they will expect
nothing less than the compliance of the victim. By trying to change the victim,
we are condoning the actions of the bully. For example, if someone is sexually
harassed should we tell them not to provoke that person again, or should we try
to prevent others from harassing in the future? If satirical cartoon artists
are murdered should we quiet ourselves and warn others not to be as provocative,
or should we teach that violence is not the way to a peaceful, understanding
future?
Silence is a quick and easy solution to a
microscopic aspect of a bigger problem.
“We
realize the importance of our voices only when we are silenced”
-Malala
Yousafzai
So I'm assuming you would have published the Charlie cartoons?
ReplyDelete"For example, if someone is sexually harassed should we tell them not to provoke that person again, or should we try to prevent others from harassing in the future?"
ReplyDeleteTouché! Even though I wouldn´t publish them myself (I never saw satire as the right cause to fight press freedom or freedom of speech for), that was well said!