After journeying through an unassuming grey gate and
halfway up a spiral staircase, I found myself in the offices of the
International Press Institute. A few twists and turns through various rooms
found my way through the labyrinthine space and into a back room where my
classmates and I had the opportunity to be a part of a discussion with Barbara
Trionfi, the interim executive director at IPI. After brief introductions (and
some pretty wonderful croissants), she delved into the topic of press freedoms
and how the western idea of freedom of the press as a fundamental right doesn’t
always line up cohesively with the values of every culture. It seems some
societies’ morals put so much value on the respect of authority that the
freedom to be able to criticize, even insult authority is out of the equation.
The question then arose of whether certain governments were using culture as a
reason to keep such complete control over their country, and eventually drifted
to the direct topic of government control in various places. Some countries
with heavy government control have a seemingly democratic system that is
spoiled by commercialism. Although citizens may be free to think what they
wish, the media that informs their thinking is heavily censored, and unbiased
true journalism is rare if found at all. There seem to be quite a few indirect
but visible methods of censorship exercised by various authorities as well, the
most surprising of which was the case of a government controlled paper industry
in Latin America. The publishers that get the most paper are the ones saying
what the government wants the people to hear; however, if someone prints what
the authorities deem unfavorable, then their only access to needed materials is
taken away.
Overall,
the visit to IPI was very pleasant and filled with extremely interesting
conversation topics that are sure to fuel future writings.
To clear up some confusion, the right to freedom of expression is a universal human right. It is Article 19 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. What Trionfi said is that the international courts have declared that when free speech butts against other rights (such as human dignity, or, the rights not to be defamed), then Article 19 is not absolute.
ReplyDeleteThe problem comes, as you stated, when some countries use this as a reason to unnecessarily quash free speech.
Thanks for the thoughtful round-up.